<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Youtube fame: web 2.0&#8217;s new brand of celebrities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bergermj.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/youtube-fame-web-20s-new-brand-of-celebrities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bergermj.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/youtube-fame-web-20s-new-brand-of-celebrities/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Youtube &#187; Youtube fame: web 2.0â€™s new brand of celebrities</title>
		<link>http://bergermj.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/youtube-fame-web-20s-new-brand-of-celebrities/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Youtube &#187; Youtube fame: web 2.0â€™s new brand of celebrities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bergermj.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-13</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bergermj wrote an interesting post today on Youtube fame: web 2.0&acirc;€™s new brand of celebritiesHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSome videos on youtube are pretty sweet; some are not. Some vids are well-done, some are honestly a waste of time. The good ones can become mildly popular, as can bad onesâ€“if there absolutely horridâ€“but the vids that reach viral status &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
